by Tom Finaldin
Bandung, The Son of The Sun
This country was so
excited when has managed to liberate themselves from foreign occupation on
August 17, 1945. We have become a sovereign nation and have a great chance to
regulate ourselves. However, the independence which we get is just be the turn
of people who become leaders. If the first moment was foreign nation, while now
the nation itself. As a matter of freedom which is a golden bridge to prosperity is only a daydream.
Foreign countries do not
want to give away Indonesia, because Indonesia
tastes delicious and tasty. So-so they were expelled, no longer led by
naked eye in Indonesia, but Indonesia must remain occupied. They were fatigue-weary
swivel brain and rotate energy to dominate Indonesian in other ways.
The results of their
thinking was called by Soekarno, The First President of Indonesia, is Nekolim (neo-colonialism imperialism), 'new style of colonization'.
Apparently, their hard work succeeded. The proof, this country never prosper
and strangers alone enjoying the lion's share of Indonesian resource.
Soekarno has always been
seen colonization efforts that are smooth and feels like a scary ghost that is
not perceived as an invisible evil, but still there is. Therefore, he
desperately to explain to the people and the political elite that democracy is
a tool of colonization in new style. However, the people and the elites
apparently had the same disease, which considers everything that comes from
outside is better, including the political system. That is because of they have
seen US success in the field of economic and military. In fact, something good
for other people's is not necessarily good also for us. In addition, the United
States has now experienced a decline in various fields, especially moral,
religious, and economic. The country has become a nest of criminals
humanitarian, environmental criminals, and economic criminals. They have
penetrated into many places in the world with their evil desires.
Whether they are becoming
our fad?
Please just follow them
like fools very stupid.
Because the elite and the
people of Indonesia were affected by the plague of democracy, there was a blend
of thought that became a state policy. Soekarno took the middle path in
implementing the policy, which is “a Guided Democracy”. The word democracy
continues to be used, but the central leadership to be a reference the end of
each deliberation.
For his political
opponents, especially those who are hurt because of their party or their mass organizations disbanded
by Soekarno, contended that in the days of Guided Democracy there was not a
democracy. For me, of all democracy in this country, Guided Democracy is
better, have more self-esteem, stronger, more stable, and more promising, as
long as all elements able to be patient and believe in the truth of the concept
of Berdikari (Berdiri di Kaki Sendiri
[self-reliance <to stand on its own feet>]). Patience is our intention to be stronger restraint so as not
to become beggars to foreign nations. In the other article I will discuss about
the awesomeness of a Guided Democracy.
The above has mentioned
that foreign nations are not willing to leave Indonesia which is incredible
pleasure. Indonesia also was encouraged to use democracy. Then, strangers
praised Indonesia to the skies. The goal is that they can still play smoothly
and sweet to get a sip sip sake and for the sake of bribes bribes from
Indonesia.
They will make the party
led by the Indonesian or finance the party which expected to win or fight to
become ruler in Indonesia. After their puppet wins, they will ask for
reciprocation and claim the promise of their puppet in Indonesia which has
managed to get power. They will ask that "dog" make their favorable
legislation, request several potential natural resources owned by them, ask
that the law is not be too hard to colleagues, ask for this and that which
would have been obvious can not be denied. After all, they were out a lot of
money and energy to help their “lices” which now has power. About the people,
ah ... from the first they did not care, people just a statistic data which
troublesome interests of imperialism.
Therefore, no wonder if we
continue poor and suffering. You see, our most important potentials has pawned
by “cockroaches” who collaborating with foreign. That is the price to be paid
because we have to implement this illusory democratic politics.
Therefore, I never get
tired to assert wherever and whenever always campaign that we have to abandon
the democratic political system is low and is only good for people who are poor
and plebeian. About low and plebeian of democratic politics, there are many
reasons in various posts on this site.
We are not a nation tacky
and low. We're just being intoxicated by poison that any time served by foreign
parties through various means, for example, through the media, universities,
lectures religious, social activities, political discussions, and a multitude
of other means seems positive, but actually smells more rotten than pus sores
ulcers.
We should go back to ourselves
and use the ways of life, the political system which is derived from the values
and norms that have been attached by Allah in the womb. Only with those are
we are capable to big, strong, have dignity, and worth before God Almighty and
all mankind. If we continue to use democracy which is clearly not of ourselves,
but adopt the thinking of those who are confused and misguided, certainly we
will be impoverished and continue dying until our bodies tightly with soil.
About Soekarno is very
anti-democratic, can be seen from the statements below. It should be an
afterthought together because Soekarno was someone who loved people and wanted
dignity for the people.
“The fate of the improvement can only come one hundred per cent in
communities where there is no capitalism and imperialism. This was due stelsel
which is the parasitic fungi grow on our bodies, alive and flourishing of our,
life and fertile of our energy, our sustenance, our society substances.
People will ask, why not simply by parliament? Do not be fulfilled
all the will of the common people in the parliament after can seize the largest
number of seats? Would not people be able to pass on all he got home economics as
long as his voice in parliament are already more than half?
Readers, in practice, the
parliament, it is obvious that such things can not happen. Firstly, because the
bourgeoisie usually gets more seats. They, the bourgeoisie, have many
propaganda tool. They have newspapers, they have radios, they have theaters,
they have schools, they have churches, they have books, they have parties.
Everything normally can ensure a majority vote for the bourgeoisie in
parliament. Overall ensure that normally messengers rabble outvoted. Secondly,
even if commoners can win the vote, even if the masses can seize the largest
number of seats, it still not possible to happen economic equality. History
democratie parliament has several times experienced arbeidersmeerderheid events.
For example, the first in the UK have occurred under the leadership of Ramsay
Mc Donald. However, in that time can be held economic equality?
Yes, political democracy
was only the smell, was not it?
In the lands of modern,
parliamentary right there, yes right there 'where representatives of the
people', it was right that people 'must govern', but ach, the bourgeoisie
richer than commoners. Those with wealth, with the letters reportedly, with
books, with schools, with the propagandist-propagandists, with cinema-theaters,
with all the means of power could affect all the minds of the voters, influence
all political activity. They are, for example, make 'press freedom' for
commoners become a mere empty talk. They conjure 'freedom of thought' to the
rabble into a bond of mind. They rape 'freedom of association' into a public
lie. They had the will become a law, they have political become state politics,
they got a war to be wars of 'country'. Therefore, the true word of Caillaux
that Europe and America are now under the rule of a new feudalism.
'However, now feudal power
was not gripped by the landlord as normal. Now it was gripped by the industry
associations that forever could impose his will against the state.'
So true also words of de
Brouckere that 'democracy' now is actually a tool of capitalism, a
kapitalistische instelling, a cover for dictatuur van het capitalism!
'Democracy' such that should we throw into the ocean, away from delusion and
desire of the masses."
Umm ... Don’t you still understand
that democracy is a tool of colonization?
If not well understood,
read the entire article on this website, hopefully Allah give guidance to us
all. Amen .