Democracy is a Tool of Colonization

by Tom Finaldin

Bandung, The Son of The Sun

This country was so excited when has managed to liberate themselves from foreign occupation on August 17, 1945. We have become a sovereign nation and have a great chance to regulate ourselves. However, the independence which we get is just be the turn of people who become leaders. If the first moment was foreign nation, while now the nation itself. As a matter of freedom which is a golden bridge to prosperity is only a daydream.

Foreign countries do not want to give away Indonesia, because Indonesia  tastes delicious and tasty. So-so they were expelled, no longer led by naked eye in Indonesia, but Indonesia must remain occupied. They were fatigue-weary swivel brain and rotate energy to dominate Indonesian in other ways.

The results of their thinking was called by Soekarno, The First President of Indonesia, is Nekolim (neo-colonialism imperialism), 'new style of colonization'. Apparently, their hard work succeeded. The proof, this country never prosper and strangers alone enjoying the lion's share of Indonesian resource.

Soekarno has always been seen colonization efforts that are smooth and feels like a scary ghost that is not perceived as an invisible evil, but still there is. Therefore, he desperately to explain to the people and the political elite that democracy is a tool of colonization in new style. However, the people and the elites apparently had the same disease, which considers everything that comes from outside is better, including the political system. That is because of they have seen US success in the field of economic and military. In fact, something good for other people's is not necessarily good also for us. In addition, the United States has now experienced a decline in various fields, especially moral, religious, and economic. The country has become a nest of criminals humanitarian, environmental criminals, and economic criminals. They have penetrated into many places in the world with their evil desires.

Whether they are becoming our fad?

Please just follow them like fools very stupid.

Because the elite and the people of Indonesia were affected by the plague of democracy, there was a blend of thought that became a state policy. Soekarno took the middle path in implementing the policy, which is “a Guided Democracy”. The word democracy continues to be used, but the central leadership to be a reference the end of each deliberation.

For his political opponents, especially those who are hurt because of their  party or their mass organizations disbanded by Soekarno, contended that in the days of Guided Democracy there was not a democracy. For me, of all democracy in this country, Guided Democracy is better, have more self-esteem, stronger, more stable, and more promising, as long as all elements able to be patient and believe in the truth of the concept of Berdikari (Berdiri di Kaki Sendiri [self-reliance <to stand on its own feet>]). Patience is our  intention to be stronger restraint so as not to become beggars to foreign nations. In the other article I will discuss about the awesomeness of a Guided Democracy.

The above has mentioned that foreign nations are not willing to leave Indonesia which is incredible pleasure. Indonesia also was encouraged to use democracy. Then, strangers praised Indonesia to the skies. The goal is that they can still play smoothly and sweet to get a sip sip sake and for the sake of bribes bribes from Indonesia.

They will make the party led by the Indonesian or finance the party which expected to win or fight to become ruler in Indonesia. After their puppet wins, they will ask for reciprocation and claim the promise of their puppet in Indonesia which has managed to get power. They will ask that "dog" make their favorable legislation, request several potential natural resources owned by them, ask that the law is not be too hard to colleagues, ask for this and that which would have been obvious can not be denied. After all, they were out a lot of money and energy to help their “lices” which now has power. About the people, ah ... from the first they did not care, people just a statistic data which troublesome interests of imperialism.

Therefore, no wonder if we continue poor and suffering. You see, our most important potentials has pawned by “cockroaches” who collaborating with foreign. That is the price to be paid because we have to implement this illusory democratic politics.

Therefore, I never get tired to assert wherever and whenever always campaign that we have to abandon the democratic political system is low and is only good for people who are poor and plebeian. About low and plebeian of democratic politics, there are many reasons in various posts on this site.

We are not a nation tacky and low. We're just being intoxicated by poison that any time served by foreign parties through various means, for example, through the media, universities, lectures religious, social activities, political discussions, and a multitude of other means seems positive, but actually smells more rotten than pus sores ulcers.

We should go back to ourselves and use the ways of life, the political system which is derived from the values ​​and norms that have been attached by Allah in the womb. Only with those are we are capable to big, strong, have dignity, and worth before God Almighty and all mankind. If we continue to use democracy which is clearly not of ourselves, but adopt the thinking of those who are confused and misguided, certainly we will be impoverished and continue dying until our bodies tightly with soil.

About Soekarno is very anti-democratic, can be seen from the statements below. It should be an afterthought together because Soekarno was someone who loved people and wanted dignity for the people.

“The fate of the improvement can only come one hundred per cent in communities where there is no capitalism and imperialism. This was due stelsel which is the parasitic fungi grow on our bodies, alive and flourishing of our, life and fertile of our energy, our sustenance, our society substances.

People will ask, why not simply by parliament? Do not be fulfilled all the will of the common people in the parliament after can seize the largest number of seats? Would not people be able to pass on all he got home economics as long as his voice in parliament are already more than half?

Readers, in practice, the parliament, it is obvious that such things can not happen. Firstly, because the bourgeoisie usually gets more seats. They, the bourgeoisie, have many propaganda tool. They have newspapers, they have radios, they have theaters, they have schools, they have churches, they have books, they have parties. Everything normally can ensure a majority vote for the bourgeoisie in parliament. Overall ensure that normally messengers rabble outvoted. Secondly, even if commoners can win the vote, even if the masses can seize the largest number of seats, it still not possible to happen economic equality. History democratie parliament has several times experienced arbeidersmeerderheid events. For example, the first in the UK have occurred under the leadership of Ramsay Mc Donald. However, in that time can be held economic equality?

Yes, political democracy was only the smell, was not it?

In the lands of modern, parliamentary right there, yes right there 'where representatives of the people', it was right that people 'must govern', but ach, the bourgeoisie richer than commoners. Those with wealth, with the letters reportedly, with books, with schools, with the propagandist-propagandists, with cinema-theaters, with all the means of power could affect all the minds of the voters, influence all political activity. They are, for example, make 'press freedom' for commoners become a mere empty talk. They conjure 'freedom of thought' to the rabble into a bond of mind. They rape 'freedom of association' into a public lie. They had the will become a law, they have political become state politics, they got a war to be wars of 'country'. Therefore, the true word of Caillaux that Europe and America are now under the rule of a new feudalism.

'However, now feudal power was not gripped by the landlord as normal. Now it was gripped by the industry associations that forever could impose his will against the state.'

So true also words of de Brouckere that 'democracy' now is actually a tool of capitalism, a kapitalistische instelling, a cover for dictatuur van het capitalism! 'Democracy' such that should we throw into the ocean, away from delusion and desire of the masses."

Umm ... Don’t you still understand that democracy is a tool of colonization?

If not well understood, read the entire article on this website, hopefully Allah give guidance to us all. Amen .